Insights

Why Sotheby’s International Realty?

George Azar explains why he chose Sotheby’s International Realty, what the business’s early mistakes taught him and how his finance background shaped its direction.

Once I decided to explore real estate, I knew that a recognised brand would be important. In luxury markets, a client is buying more than a physical asset. They are buying confidence, discretion, access and a certain level of service. The brand must communicate those qualities before the first meeting takes place. I have always been attracted to business models where quality takes precedence over volume. Ferrari and Toyota provide a useful comparison. Toyota is built around scale, efficiency and a high number of transactions. Ferrari operates with a very different proposition: fewer sales, greater scarcity, higher value and a more distinctive relationship with the customer. I saw the same distinction between conventional brokerage and luxury real estate. The volume model is focused on scale; the luxury model is focused on selectivity, expertise and service. It involves fewer transactions, but each one carries greater value and requires a more personalised client relationship. Sotheby’s International Realty was an obvious name to consider. Not only did the brand have a track record over three decades long, but its founding harkened back to the exclusive auction house started in the 1700s. And Sotheby’s brand was aligned with principles that have shaped my career, including a commitment to representing exceptional assets with the level of care they deserve. I felt no other brokerage network could make those kind of boasts. I learned that, at the time, Sotheby’s Dubai operation was underperforming, and the existing franchise arrangements were not working. When I approached the board, they questioned why they should entrust the business to a Lebanese banker with no conventional real estate track record. My response was that experience alone does not guarantee performance. I was prepared to invest my own capital and take responsibility for the outcome.

Learning From Early Mistakes

Despite my outward-facing confidence, the first years were difficult, and I made many mistakes. Even though I preferred a luxury model, we tried to operate across too much of the market. We handled rentals, sales and properties in almost every neighborhood. We experienced problems with systems, controls and internal processes. I invested millions of dollars before the business model became clear. Eventually, I stopped relying on assumptions and began to examine the data carefully. The numbers showed that we were directing too many resources toward activities that generated too little income. We were trying to behave like a mass-market agency while operating under a luxury brand. That could not continue. Much like I had felt that, in the finance world, specialisation is preferable to generalisation, I realised I needed to apply the same reasoning to luxury real estate. I decided to narrow the company’s focus to a limited number of areas and establish a minimum listing threshold. We would concentrate on selected locations, price points and types of property. That decision changed the business. We could learn our chosen areas in greater depth, build stronger relationships with relevant buyers and create a more consistent client experience. We were becoming a specialist in the segments that mattered most to us.

Applying a Financial Mindset to Property

My finance background continued to influence the way I ran Dubai Sotheby’s International Realty. I felt I understood the changing nature of Dubai and the global financial hub it was developing into, but I also wanted to understand where buyers came from, what price points they preferred, which areas generated demand and how efficiently we were using our resources. I organised the market into categories—by location, price, property type and client profile. This way of thinking helped me see real estate not simply as a collection of buildings, but as a market governed by capital, liquidity, demand and confidence. The same mindset also shaped how I worked with developers. I looked at construction costs, land costs, financing costs, interest expense and the rate at which the market could absorb new inventory. A developer might ask what could be built on a site. I also wanted to know what buyers would actually purchase, at what price and over what period. In some cases, I advised developers to change their unit mix, revise their pricing or reconsider their launch strategy. I felt strongly that the broker should not only distribute a product after it has been created, they should also contribute to the decisions that determine whether the product will succeed.

The Lessons I Carried With Me

My transition from finance to luxury real estate taught me that changing industries does not require abandoning your previous identity. The asset has changed, but the principles remain remarkably similar. I learned that:
  • Data should guide decisions, but instinct still has a role.
  • A business must align its interests with those of its clients.
  • Mistakes are unavoidable, but they must lead to better systems and judgment.
  • Focus is not a limitation; it is a source of strength.
I never planned to become a luxury real estate executive. But when I looked closely at the opportunity, I realised that real estate allowed me to apply everything I had learned in finance while building something more entrepreneurial and directly accountable. In future posts, I will examine the challenges of working with HNWI’s and expanding into the UK.
More updates

News & Insights